Skip to main content

CURIA - Documents

CURIA - Documents: JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber)

25�July 2018 (*)

(Appeal�— EU trade mark�— Three-dimensional mark representing the shape of a four-fingered chocolate bar�— Appeal directed against the grounds�— Inadmissibility�— Regulation (EC) No�207/2009�— Article�7(3)�— Evidence of distinctive character acquired through use)

In Joined Cases C‑84/17�P, C‑85/17�P and C‑95/17�P,

THREE APPEALS under Article�56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, brought on 15�February 2017 for the first and second appeals and on 22�February 2017 for the third appeal,

Soci�t� des produits Nestl� SA, established in Vevey (Switzerland), represented by G.S.P.�Vos, advocaat, and S.�Malynicz QC,

appellant,

supported by:

European Association of Trade Mark Owners (MARQUES), established in Leicester (United Kingdom), represented by M.�Viefhues, Rechtsanwalt,

intervener in the appeal,

the other parties to the proceedings being:

Mondelez UK Holdings & Services Ltd, formerly Cadbury Holdings Ltd, established in Uxbridge (United Kingdom), represented by T.�Mitcheson QC and J.�Lane Heald, Barrister, instructed by P.�Walsh and J.�Blum, Solicitors,

applicant at first instance,

European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), represented by A.�Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent,

defendant at first instance (C‑84/17 P),

Mondelez UK Holdings & Services Ltd, formerly Cadbury Holdings Ltd, established in Uxbridge, represented by T.�Mitcheson QC and J.�Lane Heald, Barrister, instructed by P.�Walsh, J.�Blum and C.�MacLeod, Solicitors,

appellant,

the other parties to the proceedings being:

European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), represented by A.�Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent,

defendant at first instance,

Soci�t� des produits Nestl� SA, established in Vevey, represented by G.S.P.�Vos, advocaat, and S.�Malynicz QC,

intervener at first instance (C‑85/17 P),

and

European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), represented by A.�Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent,

appellant,

the other parties to the proceedings being:

Mondelez UK Holdings & Services Ltd, formerly Cadbury Holdings Ltd, established in Uxbridge, represented by T.�Mitcheson QC and J.�Lane Heald, Barrister, instructed by P.�Walsh and J.�Blum, Solicitors,

applicant at first instance,

Soci�t� des produits Nestl� SA, established in Vevey, represented by G.S.P.�Vos, advocaat, and S.�Malynicz QC,

intervener at first instance (C‑95/17 P),

Popular posts from this blog

(26) Post | LinkedIn

(26) Post | LinkedIn : ► Trump was first compromised by the Russians back in the 80s. In 1984, the Russian Mafia began to use Trump real estate to launder money and it continued for decades. In 1987, the Soviet ambassador to the United Nations, Yuri Dubinin, arranged for Trump and his then-wife, Ivana, to enjoy an all-expense-paid trip to Moscow to consider possible business prospects. Only seven weeks after his trip, Trump ran full-page ads in the Boston Globe, the NYT and WaPO calling for, in effect, the dismantling of the postwar Western foreign policy alliance. The whole Trump/Russian connection started out as laundering money for the Russian mob through Trump's real estate, but evolved into something far bigger. ► In 1984, David Bogatin — a Russian mobster, convicted gasoline bootlegger, and close ally of Semion Mogilevich, a major Russian mob boss — met with Trump in Trump Tower right after it opened. Bogatin bought five condos from Trump at that meeting. Those condos were...