Skip to main content

Being Yourself: How Much is Too Much? | INSEAD Knowledge

Being Yourself: How Much is Too Much? | INSEAD Knowledge: Reasons why being yourself is flawed

Let’s look at the research.� For instance, take people who are high on self-monitoring, a personality preference defined as ‘active construction of public selves to achieve social ends’.� A highly cited study by Ajay Mehra, Martin Kilduff and Daniel Brass, found that “chameleon-like high self-monitors” were more likely than true-to-themselves “low self-monitors” to occupy central positions in social networks, which affords them greater levels of social capital and influence.� Together these characteristics predict individual workplace performance.�

There is also considerable evidence to suggest that people who present themselves as warm and competent are more likely to be liked and conferred higher levels of social status.� Furthermore, those who act with higher levels of confidence are given greater credence in the eyes of others.�

Thus, it appears that just being yourself has some distinct drawbacks. In fact, naive authenticity may do more harm than good. It presumes you know who you are; it puts the focus on the intrapersonal rather than the contextual interaction; it seems to set up you up for a narcissistic injury.

Popular posts from this blog

Elizabeth Holmes Discusses Theranos at WSJDLive 2015

Elizabeth Holmes Discusses Theranos at WSJDLive 2015 Elizabeth Holmes Discusses Theranos at WSJDLive 2015 At the WSJDLive 2015 conference, Theranos founder and CEO Elizabeth Holmes discusses her company's proprietary technologies, the FDA's inspection of its facilities, and the assertion that her company was too quick to market its products.